President-elect Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy by suggesting that U.S. ownership of Greenland is an “absolute necessity.” This renewed interest has prompted swift responses from Greenland and Denmark, emphasizing the island is not for sale while stressing the importance of international cooperation.
The Proposal: U.S. Ownership of Greenland
In a statement accompanying his nomination of PayPal co-founder Ken Howery as the new U.S. ambassador to Denmark, Trump doubled down on his belief that Greenland should come under American control.
“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity,” Trump wrote.
Read more: Donald Trump Revives Greenland Purchase Proposal, Citing National Security
This isn’t the first time Trump has floated the idea of purchasing the world’s largest island. During his first administration, the proposal was met with widespread skepticism and was ultimately dismissed.
Greenland’s Response: A Firm “Not for Sale”
Greenland’s Prime Minister, Mute Egede, wasted no time rejecting Trump’s suggestion. In a Facebook post, Egede reaffirmed Greenland’s sovereignty, stating:
“Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our year-long struggle for freedom. However, we must continue to be open to cooperation and trade with the whole world, especially with our neighbors.”
This firm stance aligns with Greenland’s longstanding commitment to self-governance and economic independence.
Denmark’s Perspective
Denmark, which maintains sovereignty over Greenland as a self-governing territory, also weighed in. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who previously called Trump’s idea “absurd” during his first administration, has refrained from further comment. Instead, her office directed attention to Greenland’s rejection and emphasized the importance of transatlantic cooperation.
“In a complex geopolitical climate, collaboration between the U.S. and its allies remains crucial,” the Danish Prime Minister’s Office stated.
Why Greenland Matters: Resources and Strategy
Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland isn’t without strategic reasoning. The island is rich in rare earth metals, coal, graphite, and uranium, making it a potentially significant player in global resource markets. According to the U.S. International Trade Association, Greenland’s rare earth resources could rank in the top five worldwide—if developed.
However, Greenland’s harsh geography and climate have made commercial mining challenging, limiting the realization of its resource potential.
From a defense perspective, Greenland also hosts the Pituffik Space Base, the U.S. military’s northernmost installation, underscoring its importance in Arctic strategy as China and Russia increase their activity in the region.
Read more: Tesla’s Ties to China: Did Elon Musk Block a U.S. Investment Bill?
Ken Howery’s Role as Ambassador
Ken Howery, who served as U.S. ambassador to Sweden during Trump’s first term, is set to take on a pivotal role in representing American interests in Denmark and Greenland.
“I look forward to working with the dedicated teams at U.S. Embassy Copenhagen and U.S. Consulate Nuuk to deepen the bonds between our countries,” Howery said in a statement.
While he avoided directly addressing Trump’s ownership claims, Howery highlighted the importance of diplomacy in strengthening alliances.
The Bigger Picture
While Trump’s renewed push for U.S. ownership of Greenland is unlikely to gain traction, it underscores the island’s growing importance on the global stage. Whether for its natural resources, strategic location, or geopolitical significance, Greenland remains a hot topic in international relations.
What are your thoughts on Trump’s proposal and Greenland’s firm stance? Share your views in the comments below!
